Some Delusional Dip Shit Named K Halk
So this idiot contacted me via email crying about a post I recently published in HuffPo, titled, "Laughing Stock Ted Cruz Wants to Be President" in which I point out all the other media outlets that are making fun of Cruz. Mind you, all of that is simply other media outlets eviscerating the teabagger, interspersed with my opinion. People seem not to understand the purpose of a blockquote that clearly marks where my writing ends and someone else's begins.
It's not worth describing where K Halk gets most of his information wrong or correcting specifically what he gets wrong. Most of the people who follow here and read my stuff know that it's corroborated and sourced - despite K Halk thinking that the only true and reputable sources as his. You'll see this in the email thread that follows.
Note also the cute and witty way he changes my name to "zombie", something that's followed me since the second or third grade, thought up by cute and witty second and third-graders.
It's always a pleasant surprise to see a supposedly full grown adult come up with that who still thinks they're being clever.
Anyway, here's the thread and if you'd like to email him his email is in there:
From: "k hawk" <email@example.com>
Subject: Ted Cruz
Date: Sat, Mar 28, 2015 1:18 PM
I think we both agree Ted Cruz won't win but that's it!
Honestly tell me. Do you write anything truthful that further facilitates national conversation? Or do you glamorize those you love while writing snotty malicious lies to shut down debate. If you don't like a figure, you can say it in an HONEST fashion. But writing insults to lead others to share in to your hate while offering no solutions is worse than yellow journalism; it's morally and ethically distasteful--pretty bad circumstances for a so-called journalist. It shows that you hit the crossroad of logical analytical assessment into smearville.
Laughing stock? Do you have one iota of knowledge of Cruz's professional career or education? It's like a blogger saying Romney is a failure. What the mouthy blogger is saying is that he or she hates Romney- for whatever reason- and can't talk smartly.
If you want to be credible, why don't you comment on Obama's wildly unsuccessful foreign policy in the Middle East? Why don't you reveal to the readers your opinion on Iran nuclear negotiations while the region burns in turmoil from ISIS, Yemen's collapse,- or in the president's words, "modern success"- Israel's conundrum, or a host of other realities?
I encourage you to create open debate without divide and political assassination.
Since you despise Cruz and his rigid practice of the constitution, I think it would behoove you to read about the founding fathers, the constitution's creation and Lincoln's exercising of our famously respected document.
I respond. Notice how he changed my name in his follow up:
Don't they warn people like you about going off your meds?
Here he comes again:
I'm not on meds. Ooh, your insults hurt so bad. Perhaps you will like me to run. Well, when people who support your brand of politics get into power they prove they can't lead.
Thanks for proving me right again. All you can do is try to hurt and defame people. I pity your weak sense of reason and tendency to hide behind your screen and lob word bombs at people who are more accomplished than you including me. It's evident you have no respect for anyone but those you want to make things the way you want. But you're sick for indoctrinating the masses to buy into you crap.
Why don't you go to work for the National Enquirer or Sun. Your works are on par to be competitive at those papers. You sure aren't qualified to write intelligent columns for respectable platforms-- only propaganda hit pieces. But that's why huff post among real news outlets is analogous to sitting at the kiddie table or the Raiders in the NFL. This where losers go. Ha ha ha...
Starting to get a little tired of this. Huffpost, by the way, has one of the largest online readerships of any major outlet. And the guys accomplishments? Who knows?
Most People get as pissed off as this when confronted with the truth. Sorry I hurt your feelings. If you're not on meds, you might want to consider it. You need them.
So, he's not mad or crazy:
Not mad. You didnt speak any truth. You need to learn the definition of opinion. You need to learn a lot. Simply saying. I'm not old, full of piss, or partisan like you. Carry on with your witch hits Mr. mean. Your insults are so effective. Ha ha
I try to help
You can probably get meds through Obama care. Ted Cruz signed up.
His grammar and spelling start to take a turn for the worst here. All thought has gone out the window. Now he's a history and legal expert. The part about the nation being founded on Republicanism (whatever that is) is pure disillusion gold. I"m betting he got that from one of Bill O'Reilly's books.
You are a truly sad little man. People like you can't argue intelligently because you just have any.
I bet you don't know anything about the nation's history or it's founding on republicanism.
The reason you can't defend your flawed perspective is because your attitude and job are built on distortion. Arguing further exposes your lack of historical and legal knowledge.
In the words of Ron White, "you can't fix stupid."
I'd been up late the night before, so I'd lost a bit of patience. I work for a living and while this guy seems to think I get paid to blog on HuffPost, he doesn't realize that I do it simply for the pleasure of watching idiots like this freak out.
In the words of John Cleese, “When you’re very, very stupid, you don’t that you’re very, very stupid. You have to be relatively intelligent to realize how stupid you are.”
You don’t realize how stupid you are, do you assclown?
You’re wrong about everything you said in your last email. Furthermore, everything I wrote about Cruz is sourced and corroborated – it’s even on video. So, quit your sanctimonious bullshit.
Also, if you’re going to talk to someone about intelligence, check your spelling, grammar and facts before opening your word hole.
This is where he questions the sources. I didn't actually use those specific sources, but it wouldn't matter. I could use the New York Times, CNN, CSPAN, FOX and have hour long videos from CSPAN, these ass clowns will accuse you of using biased sources for personal gain and to push an agenda. You know, the same shit they pull. I suppose he's right, you can actually source crap from a toilet. If that's what you're into. So technically accurate there.
Wrong? If you say so. But your foul mouth only proved you're a degenerate. Sourced? That's true because you can source crap from a toilet. Corroborated? Your resources are as dishonest and journalistically unethical as you are petty and biased. Who are your sources? MoveOn? Mother Jones?Or it must be some other slanted mouthpiece bent on silencing opposition and covering for your own.You're a mouthy brat who grew up into a dick with a keyboard.
You're a sith and a person who feeds on slime and passes it off as your truth. You write s-hit pieces and blur reality. You're irrelevant in the newsworld-a failed human being. I'm done. :-)
Right, because saying you're done is having the last word and you win. But here's the thing: For someone who wants me to listen to reason, which in his mind means him, he doesn't seem very willing to see another point of view. He just wants to be right, which is exactly what this country doesn't need Ted Cruz and idiots who think he's great.